PUBLICATION ETHICS

The Practice of The Science of Teaching Journal: Jurnal Praktisi Pendidikan (POSTJournal) is a peer-reviewed journal, following the guidelines of the Publication Ethics Committee (COPE) in publication ethics regarding research cases and publication violations. This statement regulates the ethical behaviour of all parties in this journal's publishing articles, including the author, chief editor, editor manager, editor member, reviewer, and publisher (HAFECS Press). Preventing unethical publishing practices is one of the essential responsibilities of the editorial board. The journal does not tolerate unethical behaviour or plagiarism on any scale. This section describes the standards for editors, authors, and reviewers. The publisher has no right to interfere with the integrity of the content and only supports publishing promptly.

Previously, if you wanted to read the Indonesian version, you could visit the following link.

Indonesia Version

For Authors

  1. The authors confirm that the material has not been previously published and that they have not transmitted anywhere the rights to the article.
  2. Authors must ensure the originality of the work and that they have appropriately cited the work of others according to the reference format.
  3. Authors may not engage in plagiarism or self-plagiarism.
  4. Authors must ensure that they follow the authorship criteria taken from the POSTJournal as described in the instructions for authors of the POSTJournal.
  5. Authors may not simultaneously submit the same manuscript to more than one journal. It is also hoped that the author will not publish redundant manuscripts or manuscripts describing the same research in more than one journal.
  6. Authorship should be limited to those who have contributed significantly to the conception, design, conduct or interpretation of the research being reported. Others who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. The author also ensures that all authors have seen and approved the submitted version of the manuscript and the inclusion of their names as co-authors.
  7. The author does not recommend any personal information that can make the patient's identity identifiable in any form in the description section, photographs or genealogy.
  8. The author must provide the editor with data and work details if there is any suspicion of falsification or data fabrication.
  9. If, at any time, the author finds a significant error or inaccuracy in the submitted manuscript, please report it to the editor.
  10. In document B, journal authors can clarify everything that may cause a conflict of interest, such as work, research costs, consular fees, and intellectual property.

For Editors

  1. Based on the review report from the editorial review board, the editor can accept, reject, or request modifications to the manuscript.
  2. The editor is responsible for every article published in the POSTJournal.
  3. The editor can communicate with other editors or reviewers in making a final decision.
  4. An editor should objectively evaluate manuscripts for publication, judging each on its quality without regard to the author's nationality, ethnicity, political beliefs, race, religion, gender, seniority, or institutional affiliation. He should refuse his assignment when there is a potential conflict of interest.
  5. Editors need to ensure that documents sent to reviewers do not contain information from authors and vice versa.
  6. The editor's decision must be informed to the author, accompanied by the reviewer's comments, unless it contains offensive or defamatory statements.
  7. The editor must respect the request by the author that someone does not review the submission if this is reasonable and practical.
  8. Editors and all staff must guarantee the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts.
  9. The COPE flowchart will guide the editor in case of alleged infringement or disputed authorship.

For Reviewers

  1. Reviewers should comment on ethical questions and possible research and publication misconduct.
  2. Reviewers will carry out work on time and should notify editors if they cannot complete work.
  3. Reviewers need to maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript.
  4. Reviewers should not accept review manuscripts with a potential conflict of interest between them and any author.